From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benoit v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 25, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-2224 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-2224

03-25-2020

SARAH L. BENOIT, Plaintiff v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2020, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 18) of Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick, recommending that the court deny the appeal of plaintiff Sarah L. Benoit from the decision of the administrative law judge denying her application for disability insurance benefits, and the court noting that Benoit has filed objections (Doc. 19) to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), and the Commissioner of Social Security has filed a response (Doc. 20) thereto, and following de novo review of the contested portions of the report, see E.E.O.C. v. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 99 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)), and affording "reasoned consideration" to the uncontested portions, see id. (quoting Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987)), the court agreeing with Judge Mehalchick that the administrative law judge's decision "is supported by substantial evidence," 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), a standard of review that the Supreme Court of the United States recently reiterated "is not high," Biestek v. Berryhill, 587 U.S. ___, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1154 (2019), and finding Judge Mehalchick's analysis to be thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported by the record, and further finding Benoit's objections to be without merit and squarely and correctly addressed by the report, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 18) of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick is ADOPTED.

2. The decision of the Commissioner denying Benoit's application for disability insurance benefits is AFFIRMED.

3. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner and against Benoit as set forth in paragraph 2.

4. The Clerk of Court shall thereafter CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Benoit v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 25, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-2224 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2020)
Case details for

Benoit v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:SARAH L. BENOIT, Plaintiff v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 25, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-2224 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2020)

Citing Cases

Memnune A. v. Kijakazi

In the view of this Court, this record provides substantial support for the ALJ's decision to discount…