From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benoit v. Police Dep't of Iberia Parish

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
May 23, 2014
569 F. App'x 215 (5th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-30965

05-23-2014

TERRENCE KNIGHT BENOIT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. POLICE DEPARTMENT OF IBERIA PARISH; JUDGE G. B. WATTIGNY; 16TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, Defendants-Appellees


Summary Calendar


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 6:13-CV-1376

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Terrence Knight Benoit, Louisiana prisoner # 489486, appeals the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim of his pro se, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, civil rights complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Benoit moves for appointment of appellate counsel. However, he is not proceeding in forma pauperis, and he has made no attempt to show that he is indigent. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Accordingly, his motion is denied.

In his complaint, Benoit alleged that he had been illegally arrested and was illegally confined and that after his arrest there was an illegal search and seizure. The district court agreed with the magistrate judge's determination that the complaint failed to state a claim because the relief Benoit sought - immediate release - could not be obtained via § 1983.

Although Benoit reasserts in his appellate brief the claims he raised below, he does not address the district court's reason for dismissing the complaint. Thus, he has abandoned any challenge to the district court's dismissal. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Benoit raises for the first time on appeal numerous issues that he did not raise in the district court. We decline to address these issues. See Stewart Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. U.S. Auto Glass Discount Centers, Inc., 200 F.3d 307, 316-17 (5th Cir. 2000).

AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.


Summaries of

Benoit v. Police Dep't of Iberia Parish

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
May 23, 2014
569 F. App'x 215 (5th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Benoit v. Police Dep't of Iberia Parish

Case Details

Full title:TERRENCE KNIGHT BENOIT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. POLICE DEPARTMENT OF IBERIA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 23, 2014

Citations

569 F. App'x 215 (5th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Howard v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

But appointment of counsel through § 1915(e)(1) is only available to litigants who are proceeding in forma…

Bruce v. A C A Residential, LLC

The Louisiana 9th Judicial District Court is not a juridical entity capable of being sued. See Carter v.…