From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Cupina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Opinion

November, 1926.

Present — Cochrane, P.J., H.T. Kellogg, Van Kirk, Hinman and McCann, JJ.


Order so far as it denies motion for dismissal of the complaint as to the defendants individually reversed on the law, and motion to that extent granted, on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action as to the defendants individually; and order so far as it grants leave to answer affirmed. No costs. All concur.


Summaries of

Bennett v. Cupina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for

Bennett v. Cupina

Case Details

Full title:EMMA O. BENNETT, Respondent, v. JOHN CUPINA and Others, Individually and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1926

Citations

218 App. Div. 803 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)