From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bennett v. Burton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 12, 2023
2:21-cv-1340 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1340 WBS KJN P

05-12-2023

JONATHAN BENNETT, Plaintiff, v. BURTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 28, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 28, 2023 (ECF No. 62), are ADOPTED in full;

2. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 54) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Bennett v. Burton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 12, 2023
2:21-cv-1340 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Bennett v. Burton

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN BENNETT, Plaintiff, v. BURTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 12, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-1340 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2023)