Opinion
Case No. 13-cv-328
02-03-2014
Harold Benitez, Plaintiff, v. Brandon Eitel, et al., Defendants.
Judge Michael H. Watson
OPINION AND ORDER
Several defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff's prisoner civil rights case for lack of prosecution and failure to perfect service. Mot. Dismiss, ECF No. 18. The Magistrate Judge recommended the Court deny the defendants' motion. R&R , ECF No. 31. The R&R advised the parties that they may file objections within fourteen days and that failure to file objections would result in a waiver of the right to de novo review of the R&R by the undersigned as well as waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court. R&R 11, ECF No. 31. The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R, ECF No. 31, and DENIES the defendants' motion to dismiss, ECF No. 18. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff a Rule 4(m) discretionary extension and retroactively extends the service deadline nine days, until October 9, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________
MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT