From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benandi v. Mediacom Southeast, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 24, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00498-CG-N (S.D. Ala. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00498-CG-N

10-24-2011

DARREN BENANDI, Plaintiff, v. MEDIACOM SOUTHEAST, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated September 30, 2011, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court and it is ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to remand (Docs. 6-7) be and is hereby DENIED.

Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Benandi v. Mediacom Southeast, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 24, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00498-CG-N (S.D. Ala. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Benandi v. Mediacom Southeast, LLC

Case Details

Full title:DARREN BENANDI, Plaintiff, v. MEDIACOM SOUTHEAST, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00498-CG-N (S.D. Ala. Oct. 24, 2011)

Citing Cases

Vascular Ventures, LLC v. Am. Vascular Access, LLC

"Punitive damages must be considered when determining the jurisdictional amount in controversy in diversity…

Rembert v. Progressive Direct Ins. Co.

Dees, 2017 WL 4838845, at *3 (quotation marks omitted) (relying on Jackson, 651 F. Supp. 2d at 1281). Cf.…