From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benak v. Arpaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Apr 12, 2006
No. CIV 06-0015-PHX-PGR (DKD) (D. Ariz. Apr. 12, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV 06-0015-PHX-PGR (DKD).

April 12, 2006


ORDER


Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Have Defendants Served at New Address, and Consideration for Extension of Time Limit to Serve (Doc. #11). On March 29, 2006, the service packets upon Defendants Salmon and Pam were returned unexecuted with the notation: "Per MCSO legal liaison, process not excepted [sic] for correctional health employees at the above provided address" (Doc. #9 and #10). Plaintiff indicates that he has obtained new addresses for service of Defendants Salmon and Pam. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Plaintiff's Motion to Have Defendants Served at New Address, and Consideration for Extension of Time Limit to Serve (Doc. #11).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court send service packets as to Defendant Salmon and Pam to Plaintiff. The time for completing service shall be extended sixty (60) days from the date this Order is filed.


Summaries of

Benak v. Arpaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Apr 12, 2006
No. CIV 06-0015-PHX-PGR (DKD) (D. Ariz. Apr. 12, 2006)
Case details for

Benak v. Arpaio

Case Details

Full title:David J. Benak, Plaintiff, v. Joe Arpaio, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Apr 12, 2006

Citations

No. CIV 06-0015-PHX-PGR (DKD) (D. Ariz. Apr. 12, 2006)