From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beloski v. Selmix-Alco

Workers' Compensation Commission
Jun 21, 1996
2275 CRB 5 (Conn. Work Comp. 1996)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2275 CRB-5-95-1

JUNE 21, 1996

The claimant was not represented at oral argument. Notice sent to Mark Johnson, Esq., Sullivan, Reis, Sanchy Logan.

The respondents were represented by Scott W. Williams, Esq., Maher Williams.

This Petition for Review from the January 12, 1995 Finding and Award of Dismissal of the Commissioner acting for the Fifth District was heard December 1, 1995 before a Compensation Review Board panel consisting of the Commission Chairman Jesse M. Frankl and Commissioners Roberta Smith Tracy and Amado J. Vargas.


DISMISSAL ORDER


The claimant has petitioned for review from the January 12, 1995 Finding and Award of Dismissal of the Commissioner acting for the Fifth District. To date, she has filed no documents in support of her appeal, including Reasons of Appeal, a Motion to Correct, or a brief, nor has she requested an extension of time to do so. Therefore, we must dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute with proper diligence pursuant to Practice Book § 4055. See Esquillin v. Pinto Lavado Enterprises, 13 Conn. Workers' Comp. Rev. Op. 148, 1914 CRB-2-93-12 (Feb. 1, 1995),Burke v. Abacus Transfer Storage, 13 Conn. Workers' Comp. Rev. Op. 19, 1782 CRB-3-93-7 (Nov. 3, 1994).

Commissioners Roberta Smith Tracy and Amado J. Vargas concur.


Summaries of

Beloski v. Selmix-Alco

Workers' Compensation Commission
Jun 21, 1996
2275 CRB 5 (Conn. Work Comp. 1996)
Case details for

Beloski v. Selmix-Alco

Case Details

Full title:CONSTANCE BELOSKI, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT v. SELMIX-ALCO, EMPLOYER, and…

Court:Workers' Compensation Commission

Date published: Jun 21, 1996

Citations

2275 CRB 5 (Conn. Work Comp. 1996)

Citing Cases

SCHIAROLI v. UTC/PRATT WHITNEY, NO

Thus, we have little choice but to grant the respondents' Motion to Dismiss. Soden v. Custom Bottle of…