From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bellinger v. Fludd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 8, 2020
20-CV-3605 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. May. 8, 2020)

Opinion

20-CV-3605 (CM)

05-08-2020

LEONIS BELLINGER II, Plaintiff, v. VERA FLUDD, SHERIFF, et al., Defendants.


TRANSFER ORDER :

Plaintiff, currently incarcerated in Moriah Shock Incarceration Correctional Facility, brings this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants violated his rights while he was detained in Nassau County Correctional Facility. For the following reasons, the Court transfers this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

Under the general venue provision, a civil action may be brought in:

(1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.
28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). For venue purposes, a "natural person" resides in the district where the person is domiciled. § 1391(c)(1).

Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated his rights in Nassau County Correctional Facility. Because he does not allege that any defendant resides in this District or that a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to his claim arose in this District, venue does not appear to be proper in this Court under § 1391(b)(1), (2). Plaintiff's claims arose in Nassau County, which is in the Eastern District of New York. See 28 U.S.C. § 112. Accordingly, venue lies in the Eastern District of New York, § 1391(b)(2), and this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the District of New York, see 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).

CONCLUSION

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is further directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: May 8, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

COLLEEN McMAHON

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bellinger v. Fludd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 8, 2020
20-CV-3605 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. May. 8, 2020)
Case details for

Bellinger v. Fludd

Case Details

Full title:LEONIS BELLINGER II, Plaintiff, v. VERA FLUDD, SHERIFF, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 8, 2020

Citations

20-CV-3605 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. May. 8, 2020)