From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bellamy v. Estate of Efros

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 3, 1994
209 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 3, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane A. Lebedeff, J.).


The IAS Court properly concluded that defendants were entitled to the contract deposit as liquidated damages following plaintiffs default in failing to attend on the final closing date. Although the contract did not specifically make time of the essence, defendants' counsel subsequently made it clear in his correspondence that time was of the essence (see, Liba Estates v Edryn Corp., 178 A.D.2d 152). The November 12, 1992 letter stressed that the final adjournment was being granted only as a courtesy in light of the illness of plaintiff's husband; plaintiff was told that it would be "the last" adjournment. In the December 9, 1992 letter, plaintiff again was reminded that the day scheduled for the closing was final. Although plaintiff was on notice for a month that December 12, 1992 was the final "law day", she apparently took no steps to arrange for a representative to attend the closing. As defendants concede, plaintiff was preoccupied with a personal crisis, yet she fails to explain why arrangements could be made to have a representative inspect the apartment on the day before the closing but not to have someone attend the closing itself. Plaintiff was afforded a reasonable opportunity to close or to arrange for a representative to do so.

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them to be without mert.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Bellamy v. Estate of Efros

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 3, 1994
209 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Bellamy v. Estate of Efros

Case Details

Full title:ROSA C. BELLAMY, Appellant, v. ESTATE OF RAY EFROS, Deceased, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 3, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 274

Citing Cases

Tarlovsky v. Falk

A party does not need to state that "time is of the essence;" she only needs to put the counterparty on…

Richard H. List, Inc. v. Town of Halfmoon

The parties have both appealed from the court's resulting order. Turning first to the question of liquidated…