From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 20, 2007
240 S.W.3d 738 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. ED 88933.

November 20, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of City of St. Louis, Robert H. Dierker, Jr., Judge.

Timothy Forneris, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.



ORDER


Movant, Robert Bell, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on five of his claims. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Bell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 20, 2007
240 S.W.3d 738 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Bell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert BELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Nov 20, 2007

Citations

240 S.W.3d 738 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)