From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 13, 1996
914 S.W.2d 870 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 68383.

February 13, 1996.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; HON. TIMOTHY WILSON, JUDGE.

Dave Hemingway, Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jill C. Lahue, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.


ORDER


Movant appeals from the motion court's denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Bell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 13, 1996
914 S.W.2d 870 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Bell v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN BELL, MOVANT/APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Feb 13, 1996

Citations

914 S.W.2d 870 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)