From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 25, 2003
587 S.E.2d 860 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

A03A1745.

DECIDED: SEPTEMBER 25, 2003

Concealing the death of another. Brooks Superior Court. Before Judge Altman.

James F. Council, Jr., for appellant.

J. David Miller, District Attorney, Bradfield M. Shealy, Justo C. Cabral III, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.


A Brooks County jury convicted Fred Alton Bell of concealing the death of another, OCGA § 16-10-31. The jury acquitted Bell of murder, and the trial court declared a mistrial as to the remaining charges of felony murder and aggravated assault after the jury deadlocked on those counts. Bell appeals, contending the evidence was insufficient. We disagree and affirm.

OCGA § 16-10-31 provides, "A person who, by concealing the death of any other person, hinders a discovery of whether or not such person was unlawfully killed is guilty of a felony[.]"

When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his or her conviction, "the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." (Citation and emphasis omitted.) Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 ( 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979). The jury, not this Court, resolves conflicts in the testimony, weighs the evidence, and draws reasonable inferences from the evidence. Id. "As long as there is some competent evidence, even though contradicted, to support each fact necessary to make out the State's case, the jury's verdict will be upheld." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Miller v. State, 273 Ga. 831, 832 ( 546 S.E.2d 524) (2001).

Viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the evidence showed the following facts. The victim was last seen on May 22, 2001. The next day, the victim's body was discovered in a remote field. A medical examiner determined the cause of death to be massive blunt trauma to the victim's head. The day the victim's body was discovered, Bell's fiancé returned from a two-day trip out of town and discovered Bell had packed his belongings, sold his pickup truck, couch and television. Bell announced he was going to Florida and left alone the next day with a one-way bus ticket.

The investigation led to Bell's residence, where investigators found blood stains which were later forensically matched to the victim. Investigators recovered Bell's couch from under a highway overpass and found on a cushion a blood stain later matched to the victim. Investigators found fibers from the victim's clothing in Bell's truck and found fibers from Bell's truck on the victim's clothing.

After investigators arrested Bell, Bell admitted the victim had been in his residence while his fiancé was out of town but claimed he had been under the influence of drugs and could not remember what happened. Bell admitted cleaning up blood in his residence, however, and admitted being "responsible" and the only one involved.

The evidence authorized a rational trier of fact to convict Bell under the standard of Jackson v. Virginia, supra, of concealing the victim's traumatic death and hindering the discovery of whether she was unlawfully killed. Mitchell v. State, 274 Ga. 768, 770(1) ( 560 S.E.2d 8) (2002) (defendant removed the victim's body from the scene of a shooting); Carter v. State, 238 Ga. App. 632, 633-634(1) ( 519 S.E.2d 717) (1999) (defendant set fire to residence to burn up the victim's body and other evidence linking him to the crime).

Judgment affirmed. Blackburn, P.J., and Phipps, J., concur.


DECIDED SEPTEMBER 25, 2003.


Summaries of

Bell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 25, 2003
587 S.E.2d 860 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Bell v. State

Case Details

Full title:BELL v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 25, 2003

Citations

587 S.E.2d 860 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003)
587 S.E.2d 860