From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 16, 1997
693 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 97-00164

Opinion filed May 16, 1997.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Wayne L. Cobb, Judge.


Appellant, Oliver G. Bell, seeks review of the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. We reverse because the trial court's order failed to address or refute Bell's facially sufficient claim that he was illegally sentenced as a habitual felony offender. Bell alleges that he does not have the predicate offenses to be sentenced as a habitual felony offender, and that his habitual offender sentence is therefore illegal . See Green v. State, 662 So.2d 985 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). The trial court denied the motion without attaching any documentation which would refute this claim.

Accordingly we reverse. On remand, should the trial court again deny the motion, it must attach portions of the record which refute Bell's claim.

Reversed and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Bell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 16, 1997
693 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Bell v. State

Case Details

Full title:OLIVER G. BELL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 16, 1997

Citations

693 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Bover v. State

Such an error can be determined at any time from a review of the defendant's criminal records.Id. at 78…

Moore v. State

See Bover v. State, 732 So.2d 1187 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), review granted, No. 95, 649 (Fla. Oct. 26, 1999).…