From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. McDonald/Paulino Food

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 2, 2012
11 Civ. 6208 (PKC) (KNF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 2, 2012)

Opinion

11 Civ. 6208 (PKC) (KNF)

05-02-2012

LATISHA BELL, Plaintiff, v. MCDONALD/PAULINO FOOD, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge:

By Report and Recommendation dated April 6, 2012, Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathanial Fox recommended that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute this action, pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed R. Civ. P., and failure to comply with a court order, pursuant to Rule 41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. Plaintiff commenced this action on August 26, 2011. As of March 2012, plaintiff had not filed proof of service of the summons and complaint. On March 21, 2012, Judge Fox ordered plaintiff to file proof of service by April 4, 2012, or to demonstrate good cause for failure to do so. Plaintiff did neither. Furthermore, plaintiff failed to comply with Judge Fox's instruction that she provide the Pro Se Office with a current mailing address, which has made it impossible to communicate with her. Therefore, this Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's complaint is hereby dismissed.

SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York

May 2, 2012

___________

P. Kevin Castel

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bell v. McDonald/Paulino Food

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 2, 2012
11 Civ. 6208 (PKC) (KNF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Bell v. McDonald/Paulino Food

Case Details

Full title:LATISHA BELL, Plaintiff, v. MCDONALD/PAULINO FOOD, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 2, 2012

Citations

11 Civ. 6208 (PKC) (KNF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 2, 2012)