From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Krol

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 22, 2024
13-cv-05820-SI (N.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2024)

Opinion

13-cv-05820-SI

03-22-2024

VINCENT KEITH BELL, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER KROL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ON SEALED DOCUMENTS FILED IN CONNECTION WITH SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On March 12, 2024, the Court ruled on several administrative motions to seal various documents filed in connection with defendants' motion for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 260, 261, 262. The Court denied the requests to seal certain documents. With respect to those documents, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:

Documents or Portions of Documents Sought to Be Sealed

Order

Highlighted portions to Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment • At page 12, line 18 • At page 13, line 28 through page 14, line 1

DENIED. Defendants shall file an unredacted copy of the brief on the docket no later than March 29, 2024.

Exhibit D, San Francisco County Jail Video Footage of August 13, 2013 Incident - Pod 3B, entire video

DENIED. No later than March 29, 2024, defendants shall contact the Clerk's Office regarding unsealing the video.

Exhibit E, San Francisco County Jail Video Footage of August 13, 2013 Incident - Pod 3B, entire video

DENIED. No later than March 29, 2024, defendants shall contact the Clerk's Office regarding unsealing the video.

Exhibit F, San Francisco County Jail Video Footage of August 13, 2013 Incident - Medical, entire video

DENIED. No later than March 29, 2024, defendants shall contact the Clerk's Office regarding unsealing the video.

Exhibit P to the Declaration of Steven Mills in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment • The entire document from Bates number BELL00000000181 to 294

DENIED. Defendants shall file an unredacted copy of the exhibit on the docket no later than March 29, 2024.

Exhibit R to the Declaration of Steven Mills in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment • The entire document from Bates number BELL00000000166 to 180

DENIED. The Court did not rely on this document and will therefore permit its withdrawal. Defendants shall file a notice on the docket withdrawing the exhibit no later than March 29, 2024.

Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment at: - Page 3, lines 22 - 24 - Page 17, lines 12 - 17

DENIED. Plaintiff shall file an unredacted copy of the brief on the docket no later than March 29, 2024.

The video exhibits were manually filed as attachments to the Declaration of Steven A. Mills in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bell v. Krol

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 22, 2024
13-cv-05820-SI (N.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Bell v. Krol

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT KEITH BELL, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER KROL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 22, 2024

Citations

13-cv-05820-SI (N.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2024)