From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. James

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1910
92 N.E. 1078 (N.Y. 1910)

Opinion

Argued February 15, 1910

Decided March 1, 1910

Edward P. Lyon for appellant.

William Hepburn Russell, A.J. Dittenhoefer, Edwin L. Scofield and Charles A. Deshon for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER and HISCOCK, JJ.


Summaries of

Bell v. James

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1910
92 N.E. 1078 (N.Y. 1910)
Case details for

Bell v. James

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD M. BELL, Appellant, v . THOMAS L. JAMES et al., Respondents…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 1, 1910

Citations

92 N.E. 1078 (N.Y. 1910)
198 N.Y. 513

Citing Cases

Sandoval v. Farish

We do not agree. Relief in the nature of mandamus is to be employed only when no other adequate remedy is…

McIntosh v. Board of Education

Thus, mandamus relief is appropriate where, as here, "a statute prescribes no remedy for the refusal to…