Opinion
20 CV 01588(JPC)
08-24-2021
Renzer Bell Plaintiff, v. Charles Gray, Defendant.
NOTICE OF MOTION TO VACATE THE PLAINTIFF'S DEFAULT, OR FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE DETERMINATION OF THE CPURT
JOHN P. CRONAN United States District Judge
STATE OF NEW YORK)
CO JNTY OF NEW YORK) SS, :
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the attached affidavit of Renzer Bell, affirmed on the_20th_ day of August 2023, and the exhibits attached thereto and upon all the proceedings in this case to date the Plaintiff, pro se, Renzer Bell will move this Court, at___ on the___ day of ___, at the Daniel P. Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007, for an Order, pursuant to the applicable Local Civil Rule(s), and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e), and 60, rescheduling the hearing in order that the Plaintiff may advocate on his behalf as he would have but for the mechanical failure, and the inability to get the court's response to the application for adjournment, and granting such other, and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Renzer Bell
5736 Cleveland Road
Jacksonville, Florida 32209
To:
David N. Saponara
Kudman, Trachten, Aloe, Posner, LLP
800 Third Avenue
11th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied. “[R]econsideration will generally be denied unless the moving party can point to controlling decisions or data that the court overlooked-matters, in other words, that might reasonably be expected to alter the conclusion reached by the court.” Shrader v. CSX Transp., Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995) (citation omitted). Plaintiff provides no basis that would reasonably be expected to change the Court's decision.
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff.
SO ORDERED.