From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Goodman Grp.

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 24, 2024
24-CV-2883 (KMM/JFD) (D. Minn. Jul. 24, 2024)

Opinion

24-CV-2883 (KMM/JFD)

07-24-2024

Kathy Bell, Plaintiff, v. Goodman Group, Defendant.


ORDER

JOHN F. DOCHERTY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Kathy Bell's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. (See Dkt. No. 2 (“IFP Application”).) For the following reasons, the Court denies the IFP Application without prejudice; Ms. Bell must either submit a new application or pay this action's filing fee.

“The central question [when assessing an IFP] is whether the movant can afford the costs of proceeding without undue hardship or deprivation of the necessities of life.” Ayers v. Tex. Dep't of Crim. Justice, 70 F.3d 1268, 1268 (5th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (citing Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339-40 (1948)); see also, e.g., Cox v. Comm'r of Dep't of Hum. Servs., No. 24-CV-1683 (JRT/DLM), 2024 WL 3071484, at *1 (D. Minn. June 20, 2024) (quoting Ayers-reliant caselaw). The IFP Application is not entirely clear, but appears to say that Ms. Bell has earned $39,424 in the past 12 months, and plans to earn $3,891 in the next month. (See IFP Appl. at 1.) The IFP Application also indicates that Ms. Bell is unmarried and has no dependents. (See id. at 1-3.) Given these factors, the Court cannot conclude that paying this action's filing fee would cause Ms. Bell undue hardship or deprive her of life's necessities.

The Court therefore denies the IFP Application. This denial is without prejudice- in other words, Ms. Bell may reapply if she believes that information missing from the present IFP Application would affect the Court's decision. Otherwise, she will need to pay this action's filing fee. If she does neither within 21 days of this Order's date, the undersigned will recommend dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

ORDER

Based on the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff Kathy Bell's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Dkt. No. 2) is DENIED without prejudice.

2. Within 21 days of this Order's date, Ms. Bell must either (1) pay this action's filing fee or (2) submit a new application to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. If she does neither, this action will be recommended for dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Bell v. Goodman Grp.

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 24, 2024
24-CV-2883 (KMM/JFD) (D. Minn. Jul. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Bell v. Goodman Grp.

Case Details

Full title:Kathy Bell, Plaintiff, v. Goodman Group, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jul 24, 2024

Citations

24-CV-2883 (KMM/JFD) (D. Minn. Jul. 24, 2024)