From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 27, 2006
No. 3:04-CV-0492-P (N.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2006)

Opinion

No. 3:04-CV-0492-P.

March 27, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney on Javarro Bell's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation de novo. Finding no error, the Court adopts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bell v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 27, 2006
No. 3:04-CV-0492-P (N.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2006)
Case details for

Bell v. Dretke

Case Details

Full title:JAVARRO BELL, Petitioner, v. DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, Texas Department of…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Mar 27, 2006

Citations

No. 3:04-CV-0492-P (N.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2006)

Citing Cases

State v. Jones

In considering the petition for post-conviction relief, the trial court could have viewed with skepticism the…