From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 19, 2013
80 A.3d 374 (Pa. 2013)

Opinion

2013-11-19

William J. BELL, Respondent v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Petitioner.


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court, No. 552 MAL 2013.

Prior report: Pa.Cmwlth., 71 A.3d 1092.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues as stated by petitioner are:

(1) Do convictions for homicide by vehicle and homicide by vehicle-DUI fail to merge for license suspension purposes because the statutory elements of the two offenses are mutually exclusive and Section 1532(a.1) of the Vehicle Code explicitly provides a suspension for each offense?

(2) Does the difference between criminal and civil proceedings and the lack of an explicit provision on mergerin the Vehicle Code support different merger rules for license suspension purposes than for criminal sentencing purposes?


Summaries of

Bell v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 19, 2013
80 A.3d 374 (Pa. 2013)
Case details for

Bell v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:William J. BELL, Respondent v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Nov 19, 2013

Citations

80 A.3d 374 (Pa. 2013)