From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Birkholz

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Sep 13, 2021
Civ. 21-1682 (PAM/LIB) (D. Minn. Sep. 13, 2021)

Opinion

Civ. 21-1682 (PAM/LIB)

09-13-2021

Deonte Bell, Petitioner, v. B. Birkholz and Michael Carvajal, Respondents.


ORDER

Paul A. Magnuson United States District Court Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated August 18, 2021. (Docket No. 6.) The R&R recommends that Petitioner Deonte Bell's Petition for habeas-corpus relief be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. No party objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has passed. D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).

This Court must review de novo any portion of an R&R to which specific objections are made, but in the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R only for clear error. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b); see also Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (noting that district court need only review un-objected-to R&R for clear error). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no error, clear or otherwise, in the Magistrate Judge's reasoning.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The R&R (Docket No. 6) is ADOPTED; and
2. The Petition (Docket No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Bell v. Birkholz

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Sep 13, 2021
Civ. 21-1682 (PAM/LIB) (D. Minn. Sep. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Bell v. Birkholz

Case Details

Full title:Deonte Bell, Petitioner, v. B. Birkholz and Michael Carvajal, Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Sep 13, 2021

Citations

Civ. 21-1682 (PAM/LIB) (D. Minn. Sep. 13, 2021)