From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Belcik v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 11, 2023
No. 32770-21 (U.S.T.C. Sep. 11, 2023)

Opinion

32770-21 11750-22 11753-22

09-11-2023

Joseph Belcik, Et Al., Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Joseph Robert Goeke, Judge.

For cause, it is

ORDERED that the above-referenced cases are consolidated for trial, briefing and opinion. It is further

ORDERED that if either party believes the other party's failure to stipulate facts pursuant to Rule 91 is inconsistent with the Tax Court Rules, then that party should file a motion pursuant to Rule 91(f) to compel stipulation. If the preceding sentence applies to any exhibits, such exhibits should be submitted to the Court on Dawson and marked and bates stamped in accord with the Court's Rules. Failure to comply with these instructions will likely lead to the denial of the related exhibits.


Summaries of

Belcik v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 11, 2023
No. 32770-21 (U.S.T.C. Sep. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Belcik v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Joseph Belcik, Et Al., Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Sep 11, 2023

Citations

No. 32770-21 (U.S.T.C. Sep. 11, 2023)