From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bejarano v. Chertoff

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Jun 20, 2008
CASE NO. 07-22802-CIV-HIGHSMITH (S.D. Fla. Jun. 20, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 07-22802-CIV-HIGHSMITH.

June 20, 2008


ORDER


THIS CAUSE is before the Court in this closed case upon Petitioner's Emergency Motion for Reconsideration and Relief from Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (DE #11).

Petitioner's Motion is really nothing more than his contention that this Court erred in dismissing his case. The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is "to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence." See Association for Disabled Americans, Inc. v. Amoco Oil Company, 211 F.R.D. 457, 477 (S.D. Fla. 2002). But Petitioner fails to offer any new evidence for this Court to consider. A motion for reconsideration should not be used as a vehicle to present authorities available at the time of the first decision or to reiterate arguments previously made. Because Petitioner's Motion merely rehashes arguments already brought before this Court, Petitioner's Motion is DENIED. This case remains CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at Miami, Miami-Dade County, Florida.


Summaries of

Bejarano v. Chertoff

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Jun 20, 2008
CASE NO. 07-22802-CIV-HIGHSMITH (S.D. Fla. Jun. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Bejarano v. Chertoff

Case Details

Full title:RAUL BEJARANO, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the United…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Florida

Date published: Jun 20, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 07-22802-CIV-HIGHSMITH (S.D. Fla. Jun. 20, 2008)

Citing Cases

Orozco v. Chertoff

One district court has concluded that "any decision by the certifying official to sign or decline to sign the…