From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beizer v. Schwartzben

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2004
13 A.D.3d 327 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-08868

December 6, 2004.

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has acquired certain real property by adverse possession, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered December 5, 2003, which, upon an order of the same court dated September 18, 2003, among other things, granting that branch of the defendants' motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike the complaint, dismissed the complaint.

Before: Ritter, J.P., H. Miller, Schmidt, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in striking her complaint for failure to comply with court-ordered disclosure ( see CPLR 3042 [d]; 3126 [3]; Krisztin v. Oak Beach Inn Corp., 306 AD2d 249; Gonzalez v. Guirguis, 264 AD2d 813; Zirin v. Brookdale Hosp. Med. Ctr., 216 AD2d 461, 462).


Summaries of

Beizer v. Schwartzben

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2004
13 A.D.3d 327 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Beizer v. Schwartzben

Case Details

Full title:HARRIET BEIZER, Appellant, v. N. DOV SCHWARTZBEN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 2004

Citations

13 A.D.3d 327 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
785 N.Y.S.2d 350

Citing Cases

Sealy v. Uy

If the credibility of court orders and the integrity of our judicial system are to be maintained, a litigant…

Bomzer v. Parke-Davis, Div. of Warner Lambert Co.

The plaintiff's continual delay of the discovery process with specious arguments and fact patterns asserted…