From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beinlick v. Pfile

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 17, 2023
2:17-CV-0824-WBS-DMC (E.D. Cal. May. 17, 2023)

Opinion

2:17-CV-0824-WBS-DMC

05-17-2023

BRIAN BEINLICK, Plaintiff, v. A. PFILE, Defendant.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action. No opposition to the pending motion for summary judgment has been timey filed.Therefore, pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(c), the hearing scheduled for June 7, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., before the undersigned in Redding, California, is hereby taken off calendar and the matter is submitted on the record and briefs without oral argument. The settlement conference set for July 6, 2023, at 9:00 a.m., before the undersigned in Redding, California, is vacated pending resolution of Defendant's motion for summary judgment.

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, which has been approved by the Court, Plaintiff's opposition was due by May 15, 2023. See ECF No. 77.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Beinlick v. Pfile

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 17, 2023
2:17-CV-0824-WBS-DMC (E.D. Cal. May. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Beinlick v. Pfile

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN BEINLICK, Plaintiff, v. A. PFILE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 17, 2023

Citations

2:17-CV-0824-WBS-DMC (E.D. Cal. May. 17, 2023)