From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beil v. Telesis Construction, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 1, 2009
969 A.2d 1177 (Pa. 2009)

Opinion

No. 483 EAL 2008.

April 1, 2009.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal No. 483 EAL 2008.

Prior Report: Pa.Super., 961 A.2d 1268.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED as to the following issues:

1. Did the Superior Court misapply Farabaugh v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 590 Pa. 46, 911 A.2d 1264 (2006)?

2. Did the Superior Court improperly fail to view the evidence in the light most favorable to Petitioners, as verdict-winners?

3. Did the Superior Court misapply both Section 414 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) and this Court's opinion in Byrd v. Menvin, 456 Pa. 516, 317 A.2d 280 (1974)?


Summaries of

Beil v. Telesis Construction, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 1, 2009
969 A.2d 1177 (Pa. 2009)
Case details for

Beil v. Telesis Construction, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:David Cheryl BEIL, Petitioners v. TELESIS CONSTRUCTION, INC., Lafayette…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 1, 2009

Citations

969 A.2d 1177 (Pa. 2009)
969 A.2d 1177

Citing Cases

Beil v. Telesis Construction, Inc.

3. Did the Superior Court misapply both Section 414 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) and this…