From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Behmlander v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 8, 2012
Case Number 12-14424 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 8, 2012)

Summary

denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis where the Plaintiff's income was more than twice the federal poverty level

Summary of this case from Mitchell v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

Case Number 12-14424

11-08-2012

LEONA BEHMLANDER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


Honorable Thomas L. Ludington


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND

DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation (ECF No. 5) issued by Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder on October 16, 2012, on Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4). Judge Binder recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's motion as Plaintiff indicates that her monthly income is $2,500 and that she has no dependents. Accepting Plaintiff's figure as accurate, her monthly income is more than 250 percent above the federal poverty level for a single person household ($930.83 per month).

Any party may serve and file written objections "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy" of the report and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a "de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made." Id. The Court is not obligated to review the portions of the report to which no objection was made. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). As of today's date, no party has filed any objections to Judge Binder's report and recommendation. The filing fee has not been paid.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Judge Binder's report and recommendation (ECF No. 5) is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4) is DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must pay the required filing fee before the close of business on Monday, November 26, 2012, or the case will be dismissed.

____________________

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE


The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on November 8, 2012.


Tracy A. Jacobs

TRACY A. JACOBS


Summaries of

Behmlander v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 8, 2012
Case Number 12-14424 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 8, 2012)

denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis where the Plaintiff's income was more than twice the federal poverty level

Summary of this case from Mitchell v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis where the plaintiff's income was more than twice the federal poverty level

Summary of this case from Taylor ex rel. Grove v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis where the Plaintiff's income was more than twice the federal poverty level

Summary of this case from Pickrell v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis where the Plaintiff's income was more than twice the federal poverty level

Summary of this case from Rodenback v. Stanley

denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis where the Plaintiff's income was more than twice the federal poverty level

Summary of this case from Rodenback v. Stanley

denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis where the Plaintiff's income was more than twice the federal poverty level

Summary of this case from Fang Wang v. Honda Logistics N. Am.

denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis where the Plaintiff's income was more than twice the federal poverty level

Summary of this case from Beerman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis where the Plaintiff's income was more than twice the federal poverty level

Summary of this case from Silverman v. Jones Law Grp., LLC
Case details for

Behmlander v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:LEONA BEHMLANDER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 8, 2012

Citations

Case Number 12-14424 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 8, 2012)

Citing Cases

Windsor v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

In addition to considering an individual IFP applicant's monthly income, federal courts have consistently…

Fang Wang v. Honda Logistics N. Am.

Even considering only her spouse's income places Plaintiff's household income at approximately 150% of the…