From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Behm v. Behm

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORI DA
Jan 25, 2012
CASE NO. 1D11-0566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 25, 2012)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D11-0566

01-25-2012

CHARLES R. H. BEHM, etc., Petitioner, v. CARY A. C. BEHM, et al., Respondents.

Charles R. H. Behm, pro se, Petitioner. Cary A. C. Behm, pro se, Respondent.

PER CURIAM

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

Petition for Writ of Certiorari - Original Jurisdiction.

Charles R. H. Behm, pro se, Petitioner.

Cary A. C. Behm, pro se, Respondent. PER CURIAM.

DENIED. BENTON, C.J., ROWE, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Summaries of

Behm v. Behm

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORI DA
Jan 25, 2012
CASE NO. 1D11-0566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Behm v. Behm

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES R. H. BEHM, etc., Petitioner, v. CARY A. C. BEHM, et al.…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORI DA

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1D11-0566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 25, 2012)