From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Begun v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 9, 2012
CASE NO. C12-03649-EDL (N.D. Cal. Oct. 9, 2012)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Begun v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., Inc., 2013 WL 12077974 (N.D. Cal.), aff'd sub nom. Begun v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 613 Fed.Appx. 643 (9th Cir. 2015), a court in this district interpreted precisely the same exclusion provision in a Scottsdale business and management indemnity insurance policy under California law.

Summary of this case from Hotchalk, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

CASE NO. C12-03649-EDL

10-09-2012

DARRYN BEGUN, JAY R. BEGUN, GREG TUCKER, AND CONRAD HEWITT, Plaintiffs, v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. and DOES 1-20 inclusive, Defendants.

DARIUS N. KANDAWALLA ( admitted pro hac vice) MELINDA S. NENNING (admitted pro hac vice) BAILEY CAVALIERI LLC LINDA WENDELL HSU (SBN 162971) MARK INBODY (SBN 180862) NICHOLAS P. HONKAMP (SBN 261299) SELMAN BREITMAN LLP Attorneys for Defendant SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.

Elizabeth D. Laporte

DARIUS N. KANDAWALLA (admitted pro hac vice)
MELINDA S. NENNING (admitted pro hac vice)
BAILEY CAVALIERI LLC
LINDA WENDELL HSU (SBN 162971)
MARK INBODY (SBN 180862)
NICHOLAS P. HONKAMP (SBN 261299)
SELMAN BREITMAN LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY,
INC.

DEFENDANT SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE

COMPANY, INC.'S REQUEST TO APPEAR

TELEPHONICALLY AT CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;

[PROPOSED] ORDER


Date: October 16, 2012

Magistrate Judge: Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte

Counsel for Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company, Inc. respectfully requests that the Court allow the telephonic appearance of counsel at the Case Management Conference scheduled for Tuesday, October 16, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. in the above-referenced matter.

Counsel for Defendant may be reached at the following telephone numbers:

Lead Counsel:
Darius N. Kandawalla
Melinda S. Nenning
Bailey Cavalieri LLC
(614) 229-3255

Local Counsel:
Mark Inbody
Selman Breitman LLP
(415) 979-2051

BAILEY CAVALIERI LLC

By: __________________

DARIUS N. KANDAWALLA

MELINDA S. NENNINC

Attorneys for Defendant

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.

SELMAN BREITMAN LLP

By: __________________

LINDA WENDELL HSU

MARK INBODY

NICHOLAS P. HONKAMP

Attorneys for Defendant

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

This Court GRANTS Counsel for Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company, Inc.'s request to appear telephonically at the Case Management Conference scheduled for October 16, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Summaries of

Begun v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 9, 2012
CASE NO. C12-03649-EDL (N.D. Cal. Oct. 9, 2012)

In Begun v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., Inc., 2013 WL 12077974 (N.D. Cal.), aff'd sub nom. Begun v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 613 Fed.Appx. 643 (9th Cir. 2015), a court in this district interpreted precisely the same exclusion provision in a Scottsdale business and management indemnity insurance policy under California law.

Summary of this case from Hotchalk, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.

In Begun, the state court in the underlying case found that the directors "did not provide any professional services at all," yet the district court found that the lawsuit arose out of Clickbooks' professional services because, "absent the professional services that Clickbooks undisputedly performed, Plaintiffs would not have made the business decision" that resulted in the lawsuit against them. Begun, 2013 WL 12077974, at *11.

Summary of this case from Hotchalk, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.
Case details for

Begun v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DARRYN BEGUN, JAY R. BEGUN, GREG TUCKER, AND CONRAD HEWITT, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 9, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. C12-03649-EDL (N.D. Cal. Oct. 9, 2012)

Citing Cases

Hotchalk, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.

The legislative history behind the incentive compensation ban makes clear that it was intended to regulate…

1 Citing Cases