Opinion
CASE NO.: SC13-1410 Lower Tribunal No.: 4D11-4822 Lower Tribunal No.: 502008CA041520 XXXXM
01-22-2014
JAMES G. BEEKMAN Petitioner(s) v. INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, ETC., ET AL. Respondent(s)
Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test:
____________________________
John A. Tomasino
Clerk, Supreme Court
sh
Served:
THOMAS GRANT NEUSOM
DOUGLAS CLARK ZAHM
WILLIAM PATRICK HELLER
NANCY MASON WALLACE
MICHAEL JOSEPH LARSON
JOSHUA HOWARD THREADCRAFT
JAMES BEEKMAN
HON. SHARON BOCK, CLERK
HON. MARILYN BEUTTENMULLER, CLERK