From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beecham v. Yellch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 30, 2014
12-CV-7209 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2014)

Opinion

12-CV-7209

04-30-2014

ROGER BEECHAM, Petitioner, v. BRUCE YELLCH, Superintendent, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

Seibel, J.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison dated April 11, 2014 ("the R&R"). (Doc. 17.) No objections to the R&R have been filed. Accordingly, I have reviewed it for clear error, and find no error, clear or otherwise. The R&R is therefore hereby adopted as the decision of the Court, and the Petition is denied. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. Because reasonable jurists would not find it debatable that Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing that he was denied a constitutional right, and that Petitioner's Miranda claim is procedurally barred, no certificate of appealability will issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000). SO ORDERED. Dated: April 30, 2014

White Plains, New York

___________

CATHY SEIBEL, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Beecham v. Yellch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 30, 2014
12-CV-7209 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Beecham v. Yellch

Case Details

Full title:ROGER BEECHAM, Petitioner, v. BRUCE YELLCH, Superintendent, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 30, 2014

Citations

12-CV-7209 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2014)