Opinion
July Term, 1852
S. Sherwood, for appellants.
Wm. P. Buffett, for respondents.
THE COURT decided that the statute did not authorize the appeal in that stage of the cause. That it should have been delayed until after the entry of judgment making partition, when both the intermediate order and the judgment would have been open for review. ( See Code, §§ 11, 245, 333; Cruger v. Douglass, 2 Comst. 571.)