From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beebe v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Sep 30, 2020
304 So. 3d 811 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D19-2447

09-30-2020

Steven BEEBE, Appellant, v. Florida DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

Steven Beebe, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristen J. Lonergan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Steven Beebe, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristen J. Lonergan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . See Jackson v. Parkhouse , 826 So. 2d 478, 479 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (approving dismissal of mandamus petition because inmate did not meet his burden to "plead and prove that he had exhausted administrative remedies," where his petition failed to demonstrate that he completed his administrative appeal); see also Fla. Admin. Code R. 33-103.007(2) (requiring inmate to attach formal grievance, response, and any documentation pertinent to review that he wants reviewed; and providing that an incomplete grievance appeal will be returned to the inmate without action).

Ray, C.J., and Rowe and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Beebe v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Sep 30, 2020
304 So. 3d 811 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Beebe v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN BEEBE, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Sep 30, 2020

Citations

304 So. 3d 811 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)