From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bedford v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 2008
55 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

October 30, 2008.

Determination of respondent Commissioner, dated September 15, 2006, which, after a hearing, imposed one year of probationary dismissal, suspension for 30 days and forfeiture of 30 vacation days, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and this proceeding (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Walter B. Tolub, J.], entered August 1, 2007) dismissed, without costs.

Before: Tom, J.P., Nardelli, Sweeny, McGuire and DeGrasse, JJ.


Substantial evidence supports the finding that petitioner engaged in conduct prejudicial to the good order, efficiency and discipline of the Police Department, utilized its computers for a non-Department or unauthorized use, and failed to supervise properly the conduct of members of the service subordinate to him. The penalty imposed does not shock our sense of fairness ( see Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 39-40).


Summaries of

Bedford v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 2008
55 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Bedford v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TINEL BEDFORD, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND W. KELLY, as Police…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 30, 2008

Citations

55 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
867 N.Y.S.2d 397

Citing Cases

Lynch v. Hickey

Defendants pursued that remedy in preference to an appeal which is permitted by the same section of the act.…

Roming v. Shivers

By obtaining certiorari, appellant waived all objections to the sufficiency of the evidence, and only…