From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bedasee v. Nat'l City Bank

Supreme Court of Florida.
Mar 27, 2014
139 So. 3d 295 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC13–2017.

2014-03-27

Owen BEDASEE, et al., Petitioner(s) v. NATIONAL CITY BANK, Respondent(s).


Because petitioners have failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, they are not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla.2000).

PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bedasee v. Nat'l City Bank

Supreme Court of Florida.
Mar 27, 2014
139 So. 3d 295 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Bedasee v. Nat'l City Bank

Case Details

Full title:Owen BEDASEE, et al., Petitioner(s) v. NATIONAL CITY BANK, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Mar 27, 2014

Citations

139 So. 3d 295 (Fla. 2014)