From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Becton, Dickinson v. C.I.R

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 24, 1943
134 F.2d 354 (3d Cir. 1943)

Opinion

No. 8241.

Argued February 18, 1943.

Decided February 24, 1943.

Appeal from United States Board of Tax Appeals (now Tax Court of the United States).

Petition by Becton, Dickinson Company to review a decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals redetermining a deficiency in the tax imposed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

Decision affirmed.

Montgomery B. Angell, of New York City (William H. Harrar, of New York City, on the brief), for petitioner.

Alvin J. Rockwell, of Washington, D.C. (Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

Before MARIS, JONES, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.


The sole question which was before the Board of Tax Appeals in this proceeding was whether the petitioner was availed of during the taxable year for the purpose of preventing the imposition of surtaxes on its shareholders within the meaning of Section 102(a) of the Revenue Act of 1938, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 102(a). This was solely a question of fact (Helvering v. National Grocery Co., 304 U.S. 282, 58 S.Ct. 932, 82 L.Ed. 1346) which the Board resolved against the petitioner. Its finding was amply supported by the evidence as its memorandum opinion amply demonstrates.

The decision of the Board is accordingly affirmed.


Summaries of

Becton, Dickinson v. C.I.R

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 24, 1943
134 F.2d 354 (3d Cir. 1943)
Case details for

Becton, Dickinson v. C.I.R

Case Details

Full title:BECTON, DICKINSON CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 24, 1943

Citations

134 F.2d 354 (3d Cir. 1943)

Citing Cases

World Pub. Co. v. United States

29.102 — 2, Reg. III; Universal Steel Co. v. Commissioner, 5 T.C. 627, 637; Whitney Chain Mfg. Co., 3 T.C.…

Kerr-Cochran, Inc. v. Commissioner

The function of exercising judgment and making evaluation within these bounds is as to § 102(c) exclusively…