From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beckham v. Byars

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Oct 30, 2012
Civil Action No.: 6:12-119-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 6:12-119-MGL

10-30-2012

Stephen A. Beckham, Plaintiff, v. William Byars, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND OPINION

Plaintiff Stephen A. Beckham is an inmate in custody at McCormick Correctional Institution in McCormick, South Carolina. On January 13, 2012, Plaintiff proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02 D.S.C., this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kevin F. McDonald for pretrial handling.

On September 6, 2012, Plaintiff filed a "Withdrawal of Complaint" indicating that he intended to seek legal counsel. (ECF No. 69.) The Magistrate Judge construed Plaintiff's pleading as a motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The Defendants did not file a response to the motion. Thus, Magistrate Judge McDonald recommended that Plaintiff's motion be granted and this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). (ECF No. 71.)

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The court may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the Magistrate Judge with instructions. Id. The court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objections are made. Neither party filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.

After a careful review of the record, the applicable law, and the Report and Recommendation, the court finds the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to be proper. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Mary G. Lewis

United States District Judge
Spartanburg, South Carolina
October 30, 2012


Summaries of

Beckham v. Byars

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Oct 30, 2012
Civil Action No.: 6:12-119-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Beckham v. Byars

Case Details

Full title:Stephen A. Beckham, Plaintiff, v. William Byars, et al., Defendants.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 30, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No.: 6:12-119-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2012)