From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Becker v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 20, 2006
Civil Action 2:05-CV-908 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 20, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:05-CV-908.

September 20, 2006


ORDER


On August 3, 2006, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, Doc. No. 11, be denied and that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Doc. No. 23, be denied. Plaintiff was directed to effect proper service of process, in conformity with S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 4.2, within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to properly effectuate service of process, as set forth in the Report and Recommendation, could result in dismissal of this action. The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report and Recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. The Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, Doc. No. 11, is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Doc. No. 23, is likewise DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Becker v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 20, 2006
Civil Action 2:05-CV-908 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 20, 2006)
Case details for

Becker v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution

Case Details

Full title:DALE G. BECKER, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN ROSS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, et…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Sep 20, 2006

Citations

Civil Action 2:05-CV-908 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 20, 2006)