From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Becker v. Carney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Sep 14, 2020
Case No. 3:16-cv-05315-RSM-JRC (W.D. Wash. Sep. 14, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 3:16-cv-05315-RSM-JRC

09-14-2020

ASHER J. BECKER, Plaintiff, v. BRENT CARNEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura, objections to the Report and Recommendation filed by Plaintiff and Defendants, Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's objections, and the remaining record, hereby finds and ORDERS:

(1) Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion (Dkt. #199) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. All claims are dismissed with prejudice except the § 1983 claim that Joe Williamson retaliated against Plaintiff.

(2) Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #211) is DENIED as untimely.

(3) The Clerk shall send copies of this order to Plaintiff and Judge Creatura.

DATED this 14th day of September, 2020.

/s/_________

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Becker v. Carney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Sep 14, 2020
Case No. 3:16-cv-05315-RSM-JRC (W.D. Wash. Sep. 14, 2020)
Case details for

Becker v. Carney

Case Details

Full title:ASHER J. BECKER, Plaintiff, v. BRENT CARNEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Date published: Sep 14, 2020

Citations

Case No. 3:16-cv-05315-RSM-JRC (W.D. Wash. Sep. 14, 2020)

Citing Cases

Huy-Ying Chen v. King Cnty. Sheriff's Office

Despite that warning and his obligations as a litigant, Mr. Chen has violated the Court's scheduling order…