From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BECK v. KOPPERS, INC.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Western Division
Dec 22, 2005
Civil No. 3:03CV60-P-D, Consolidated With Civil No. 3:04CV160-P-D (N.D. Miss. Dec. 22, 2005)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:03CV60-P-D, Consolidated With Civil No. 3:04CV160-P-D.

December 22, 2005


ORDER


This matter comes before the court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Injunctive Relief [28-1]. Upon due consideration of the motion and the response filed thereto, the court finds as follows, to-wit:

The motion is not-well taken and should be denied. A preliminary injunction is inappropriate and impractical in this case. A trial is necessary to determine the veracity of the matters alleged in the motion. Granting the preliminary injunction would improperly circumvent the need for a trial.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Injunctive Relief [28-1] filed in Ellis, et al. v. Koppers, Inc., et al., Cause Number 3:04CV160 is DENIED. This order should be docketed in both Beck, et al. v. Koppers, Inc. et al., Cause Number 3:03CV60 and Ellis, et al. v. Koppers, Inc., et al., Cause Number 3:04CV160.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

BECK v. KOPPERS, INC.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Western Division
Dec 22, 2005
Civil No. 3:03CV60-P-D, Consolidated With Civil No. 3:04CV160-P-D (N.D. Miss. Dec. 22, 2005)
Case details for

BECK v. KOPPERS, INC.

Case Details

Full title:FRED BECK, Individually and on behalf of the Estate of EASTER BECK…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Western Division

Date published: Dec 22, 2005

Citations

Civil No. 3:03CV60-P-D, Consolidated With Civil No. 3:04CV160-P-D (N.D. Miss. Dec. 22, 2005)