From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beccio v. Cam Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Mar 12, 1993
620 A.2d 939 (Md. 1993)

Opinion

No. 100, September Term, 1992.

March 12, 1993.

Certiorari to Court of Special Appeals (Circuit Court for Baltimore City); Clifton J. Gordy, Jr., Judge.

Janet D. Bacot, Arnold, Bacot, Gay Tingle, P.A., on brief, Baltimore, for petitioner.

Rudolph L. Rose, P.C., P. Matthew Darby, Severn E.S. Miller, Semmes, Bowen Semmes, on brief, Baltimore, for respondent.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE, CHASANOW, KARWACKI and ROBERT M. BELL, JJ.


For reasons stated by Judge Diana G. Motz for the Court of Special Appeals in CAM Construction v. Beccio, 92 Md. App. 452, 608 A.2d 1264 (1992), the judgment is affirmed.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED, WITH COSTS.


Summaries of

Beccio v. Cam Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Mar 12, 1993
620 A.2d 939 (Md. 1993)
Case details for

Beccio v. Cam Construction Co.

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT J. BECCIO v. CAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ET AL

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Mar 12, 1993

Citations

620 A.2d 939 (Md. 1993)
620 A.2d 939

Citing Cases

Youngblud v. Fallston

As his written opinion makes plain, the trial judge properly recognized that in an essentially de novo action…

Barnes v. Children's Hosp

Although no exact formula for the matter exists, an injury arises out of employment if it results from the…