From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BEAULIEU v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF W. FLA

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jul 9, 2007
Case No.: 3:07cv30/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 9, 2007)

Summary

describing the majority view as one in which parties "need not file an answer while a partial motion to dismiss as pending"

Summary of this case from Matter v. Clearlake Vill. Homeowner's Ass'n

Opinion

Case No.: 3:07cv30/RV/EMT.

July 9, 2007


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated June 4, 2007. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Under Rule 55 (Doc. 28) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

BEAULIEU v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF W. FLA

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jul 9, 2007
Case No.: 3:07cv30/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 9, 2007)

describing the majority view as one in which parties "need not file an answer while a partial motion to dismiss as pending"

Summary of this case from Matter v. Clearlake Vill. Homeowner's Ass'n
Case details for

BEAULIEU v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF W. FLA

Case Details

Full title:ARDELI BEAULIEU, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF WEST…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Jul 9, 2007

Citations

Case No.: 3:07cv30/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 9, 2007)

Citing Cases

Matter v. Clearlake Vill. Homeowner's Ass'n

However, a partial answer does not moot a partial motion to dismiss when the two involve different counts of…

Ferk v. Mitchell

Defendant has not moved to dismiss or otherwise responded to Count V of Plaintiff's Complaint, electing…