Beauford v. State

Full title: SHIRONALD BEAUFORD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 24, 1997

689 So. 2d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-3066

Opinion filed January 24, 1997 Rehearing Denied March 6, 1997

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Reginald K. Whitehead, Judge.

Shironald Beauford, Orlando, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's summary denial of Beauford's second Rule 3.850 motion¹. Beauford is barred from raising issues which could or should have been raised in his first Rule 3.850 motion. This one attempts to do that and thus it is successive and improper. See Henry v. State, 679 So.2d 885 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Scott v. State, 656 So.2d 204 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

1 Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, SHARP, W., and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.