From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beatty v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 31, 1996
227 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 31, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Glownia, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Wesley, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in granting plaintiff's motion for the appointment of a temporary receiver of the real property at 11-13 East Utica Street in Buffalo. Plaintiff met his burden of demonstrating that he has an "apparent interest" in the property (CPLR 6401 [a]; see, Nelson v. Nelson, 99 A.D.2d 917) and establishing by clear and convincing evidence that there was a likelihood "of irreparable loss or damage" if a receiver were not appointed ( Groh v. Halloran, 86 A.D.2d 30, 33; see, Lefebvre v Shea, 212 A.D.2d 884, 885; Somerville House Mgt. v. American Tel. Syndication Co., 100 A.D.2d 821, 822; cf., Serdaroglu v Serdaroglu, 209 A.D.2d 606, 608).

In light of the issues of fact regarding the ownership interests of the parties, the court properly denied that part of the cross motion of Lamont Williams (defendant) seeking summary judgment. The court erred, however, in denying that part of defendant's cross motion for an order requiring plaintiff, a non-resident, to post security for costs ( see, CPLR 8501 [a]; Siegel, N Y Prac § 414, at 630 [2d ed]). We reject as excessive the amount of security proposed by defendant, and fix the amount at $5,000 ( see, CPLR 8503; Howell v. Rothberg, 197 A.D.2d 815).

The other issues raised by defendant in his notice of appeal are deemed abandoned ( see, Ciesinski v. Town of Aurora, 202 A.D.2d 984).


Summaries of

Beatty v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 31, 1996
227 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Beatty v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:JAMES BEATTY, Respondent, v. LAMONT WILLIAMS, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 31, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 267

Citing Cases

Waterman v. CNH Am. LLC

Memorandum: We conclude, for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court, that the motions of…

Singh v. Brunswick Hospital Center, Inc.

In this case, the documentary evidence sufficiently established that the plaintiffs have an "apparent…