From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beattie v. Schenectady Railway Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 1, 1902
77 App. Div. 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)

Opinion

December Term, 1902.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate injunction denied, with ten dollars costs. Injunction modified by striking out that part thereof which reads as follows: "And that they be further enjoined and restrained, until the further order of the court, from interfering with the removal of the railroad poles and wires, and the restoration of the street by the plaintiff herein," upon opinion in Paige v. Schenectady Railway Company ( ante, p. 571). All concurred, except Kellogg, J., dissenting.


Summaries of

Beattie v. Schenectady Railway Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 1, 1902
77 App. Div. 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)
Case details for

Beattie v. Schenectady Railway Company

Case Details

Full title:Isabella Beattie, Appellant, v. Schenectady Railway Company, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1902

Citations

77 App. Div. 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)