BEATH v. NEE

1 Citing case

  1. Merlini v. Canada

    926 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2019)   Cited 8 times
    Upholding jurisdiction under the FSIA's commercial exception over a claim by a clerical worker in the Canadian consulate in Boston who was injured when she tripped over a cord

    Chapter 152 requires, in relevant part, only that an employee must show "that [the employer] had to carry worker's [sic] compensation insurance" for an employee and "that [the employer] did not carry it." Beath v. Nee, 74 Mass. App. Ct. 1119, 1119 (2009) (unpublished). The statute does not require any showing regarding what alternative means, if any, the employer may have used to compensate the employee once the employee has shown that the employer was not insured within the meaning of chapter 152.