Opinion
No. 66810
03-17-2015
SAMUEL NATHANIEL BEASLEY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a motion to modify sentence. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge.
This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).
In his motion filed on September 9, 2014, appellant claimed that NRS 200.366 is impermissibly ambiguous. Appellant's claim fell outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to modify sentence. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, without considering the merit of appellant's claim, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the motion. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
/s/_________, C.J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, C.J.
Tao
/s/_________, C.J.
Silver
cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge
Samuel Nathaniel Beasley
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk