From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beasley v. Cnty. of Los Angeles

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 28, 2022
2:22-cv-05885-MCS-AFM (C.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-05885-MCS-AFM

11-28-2022

MARK TYRONE BEASLEY v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL


THE HONORABLE MARK C. SCARSI, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE.

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than December 5, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following on or before the above date as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause:

_X_ Proof of service of summons and complaint

___ Response to the complaint by the defendant or an application for entry of default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a)

___ Application for entry of default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)

No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Beasley v. Cnty. of Los Angeles

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 28, 2022
2:22-cv-05885-MCS-AFM (C.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Beasley v. Cnty. of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:MARK TYRONE BEASLEY v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 28, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-05885-MCS-AFM (C.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2022)