From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bearden v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Nov 12, 2009
No. 09-09-00325-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 12, 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-09-00325-CR

Opinion Delivered November 12, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH

On Appeal from the 356th District Court, Hardin County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 13,890.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., KREGER and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On September 29, 2009, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why he needed time for filing the record. The appellant did not file a response. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Bearden v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Nov 12, 2009
No. 09-09-00325-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Bearden v. State

Case Details

Full title:WALTER LEON BEARDEN, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Nov 12, 2009

Citations

No. 09-09-00325-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 12, 2009)